Systemic Risk
Risk managers, ideally, contribute to long range planning and analysis. In a recent workshop, participants and I were discussing risk assessment of the firm’s strategic plan. Risk managers must consider wider systemic risk that could undermine the organization. They must also manage emerging risk on a longer time horizon.
On the issue of strategic risk, I first draw the reader’s attention to my 6-part series in which I discussed high quality risk assessment and future scenarios; strategic identity; stakeholders; and environmental scan. The essential point in that series is that risk assessment should be part of a complete research and planning process, incorporating methods to deal with “black swan” risks and high uncertainty.
In this post, I want to elaborate on the idea of risk managers questioning assumptions that typically go unchallenged. Risk managers can help broaden the range of discussion that informs corporate direction.
The Economist’s risk management study in 2010 found that there is a continuing perception of risk management as: “…support function staffed with narrowly focused specialists, such as business continuity planners, insurance buyers, or health and safety officers…” (Fall guys – risk management in the front line). Then Forbes/Deloitte reported in 2012 that a significant sector of corporate employees are “unaware of what they need to do concerning risk”. (Aftershock: adjusting to the new world of risk management).
In this second post, I give my proposed definition of both Enterprise Risk Management and Risk Assessment. They are not a reflection of the actual usage of the terms; instead, they are recommendations for what the terms should denote:
Enterprise Risk Management is a relatively young discipline. There is no universal agreement on what it really consists of. In some of the academic literature, the definition is assumed. Authors don’t bother with it, and yet actual practice of what people call ERM is varied.

